Title of Feasibility Study (FS) | Biogas Electricity Generation through Anaerobic Digestion of Waste |
FY | FY 2007 |
Main Implementing Entity | Taisei Corporation |
FS Partner(s) | The People’s Committee of Can Tho City, Hokkaido Electric Power Co., Inc., Sojitz Research Institute, Ltd. |
Location of Project Activity | Socialist Republic of Viet Nam |
Summary of FS Report | Summary (PDF443KB) |
Description of Project Activity | In the proposed project the municipal wastes delivered to Tan Long disposal center from Can Tho City as well as from the neighboring regions will be segregated for mechanically recovering biogas to generate electric power to be supplied to the external grid network eventually. The disposal treatment process enables stopping the selected organic residues from being land-filled, resulting in decreasing methane gas emissions if the proposed project not implemented. |
Targeted GHG | CH4、CO2 |
Category of Project Activity | Waste Management |
CDM/JI | CDM |
Duration of Project Activity/ Crediting Period | 2009-2020/ 2010-2019 |
Baseline Methodology/ Additionality | In the proposed project, the approved methodology AM0025 “Avoided emissions from organic waste through alternative waste treatment processes” may be applied. Substitute scenarios are shown as under: <For Waste Disposal Treatment>
|
Estimation of GHG Emission Reductions | Approximately 101,200t-CO2e/10years |
Monitoring Methodology | Monitoring mandates will be employed by ACM0025(Version 10) specifications. The special purpose company (SPC) will commission the operation and maintenance of the waste treatment plant to Urban Public Works Company (UPWC), which is the project participant of the Host Country. UPWC is in charge of monitoring as well. |
Environmental Impact Analysis | The following environmental impacts are expected from the proposed project activity;
|
Issues and Tasks for Project Realisation | The projected IRR will be minus when this project is completed in 2020 (10th year after CER revenue is fixed), and the prospective effect of this project will not be worth its investment cost. Therefore, it is concluded that this project will not be a successful CDM project, and that this project should be resigned to implement. |